Friday 27 January 2017

Politics at Friday Lunch: Theresa and Donald, sitting in a tree…

"Sometimes opposites attract" - Theresa May
View this email in your browser

It was enough to make you feel unwell. When Theresa May arrived in the US to become the first world leader to meet the new American president, she told reporters that despite their different styles, "sometimes opposites attract".

Given that Donald Trump was in the process of setting up an explicitly Islamophobic immigration system, building a border wall with Mexico, sparking a trade war, tearing up trade agreements, establishing a regular publication of so-called 'immigrant crimes', planning a mass deportation programme, instituting torture as official US policy, creating a White House run by family relations and trying to starve the UN of cash, the attraction was not necessarily welcomed on this side of the pond. And given the fact that Trump's self-professed approach to women constitutes sexual assault, it didn't seem particularly wise in terms of personal security either.

But the fear that May would be fawning and obsequious in the US appears to have been wide of the mark. The prime minister's address to Republicans in Philadelphia was a masterclass in British tent logistics. May assessed the full potential range of the opinions she might express while staying in the tent, she tracked the outside, measured up the diameters, checked the fastenings were all in place and then, in carefully coded language, she let loose. From Islam, to Nato, to the UN, to Russia, to the Iran deal, to liberalism, to free trade - she covered all the bases.

"We should always be careful to distinguish between this extreme and hateful ideology, and the peaceful religion of Islam and the hundreds of millions of its adherents," she said. "With President Putin, my advice is to 'engage but beware'... We should engage with Russia from a position of strength."

She went on: "The nuclear deal with Iran was controversial but it has neutralised the possibility of the Iranians acquiring nuclear weapons for more than a decade." Then: "We must turn towards those multinational institutions like the UN and Nato that encourage international cooperation and partnership."

The trouble with all this carefully-constructed messaging is that it's addressed to a human baboon. Will Trump understand? Does he have the mental capacity to even notice that he's being told off? If he does, does he have the emotional interest in responding to it? Most importantly of all, is there any bite behind May's discreet bark?

Because when you boil it down, May needs Trump more than Trump needs May. Sure, he could use credibility from an international leader, especially when he's being stood up by the Mexican president. And the flip side of him tearing up multilateral trade deals is that he needs to secure bilateral trade deals to show he's not just a vandal but a deal-maker. That obviously chimes perfectly with May's keen desire for a US-UK deal, in order to make it appear that Brexit can be a success.

But ultimately the needs are lopsided. It is Britain which is starting out alone in the world, cutting itself off from its largest export market. And May might stop to ponder why Trump prefers bilateral rather than multilateral deals. It's because one country is easier to boss around. Groups of countries find it easier to stand up the US.

What kinds of things do they need to stand up against? Certainly not tariffs, which are of little consequence really at this level. It's standards and regulations. US negotiators will want reduced controls on drug prices - something which will exacerbate, possibly to existential levels, the NHS crisis. They want reduced consumer protections around chemicals. They want lower data protection standards. They want radically reduced animal welfare and consumer protection laws around food, so that hormone-injected beef and chlorine-washed chicken can be sold in the UK.

And that's just for starters. After all, these are the types of demands the US made in deals which Trump considers insufficiently in America's interest. What he'd demand from a desperate UK eagerly demanding a US trade deal may be too awful to contemplate.

If anything protects Britain from this eventuality, it is time. It can't do formal negotiations while still an EU member, so that takes us to 2019. But even once Brexit happens, it will be impossible to have meaningful talks with the UK about trade until we know what kind of access it has to the half a billion consumers in the single market and that - a period which comes under May's purposefully misnamed 'implementation' stage - might not be sorted until 2025.

May and Trump will emerge today brandishing promises of a trade deal in the near future. But this is mostly PR. The reality is that talks won't start for some time and that when they do start, they'll take a good long while.

If they don't take a while, it's because Britain capitulated in every area. And that should make you feel much more unwell than May's flirtatious rhetoric.

Latest Articles

 
 

Theresa May will be quietly pleased with the Supreme Court judgement


 

On Jan 24, 2017 11:48 am
The prime minister was foolish to bring today's case, she'll be relieved the decision wasn't a lot worse
Read more... »
 


 
 

May will lose all respect if she doesn't raise human rights concerns with Trump


 

On Jan 26, 2017 11:36 am
Trump's only been in power a few days but there are already a list of issues May must challenge him on
Read more... »
 

Tories threatened by their own nuclear meltdown in Copeland


 

On Jan 26, 2017 10:07 am
It's not just Labour that faces a nuclear problem in the upcoming byelection
Read more... »
 

Benoit Hamon: Meet the 'French Jeremy Corbyn'


 

On Jan 25, 2017 08:48 am
Who is the surprise French Socialist front runner and what are his chances of success?
Read more... »
 

Brexit critics need to start working within the system


 

On Jan 24, 2017 09:17 am
If Remainers want to influence the outcome of Brexit they must first accept that it's happening
Read more... »
 

May isn't going to protect workers' rights


 

On Jan 24, 2017 08:33 am
Post-Brexit Britain will leave millions of migrant workers at risk of abuse
Read more... »
 

Taking back control: Why voters need a say on Brexit plans


 

On Jan 23, 2017 09:47 am
Public involvement will be vital in the coming months
Read more... »
 

Opinion Formers press releases

 
 

Expectation builds ahead of Conference


Spaces are filling up fast for CIHT's Annual Conference
Read more... »
 

Gross mortgage lending increases by 12% in 2016


The Council of Mortgage Lenders estimates that gross mortgage lending reached £20.4 billion in December.
Read more... »
 
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Copyright © 2017 Senate Media Ltd, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at www.politics.co.uk

Our mailing address is:
Senate Media Ltd
18 Vine Hill
London, EC1R 5DZ
United Kingdom

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Friday 20 January 2017

Politics at Friday Lunch: Britain’s double-think prime minister

"Britain must face up to a period of momentous change" - Theresa May
View this email in your browser

One week, two speeches, both of them completely contradicted by the reality of what the prime minister is actually doing.

Theresa May issued her long-awaited Brexit plan speech in Lancaster House on Tuesday and then cut-and-pasted bits of it with some new sections for business leaders in Davos on Thursday. The speeches weren't particularly good, her ideas weren't particularly new and her delivery was not particularly impressive. But their central problem was that they are directly undermined by her own policies.

"We are all united in our belief that that world will be built on the foundations of free trade, partnership and globalisation," she said in Davos. This was a remarkable thing to say, given that just days earlier she had announced she was pulling Britain out of the European single market and customs union, which eliminate tariffs for goods across borders, standardises regulation so products can be traded more easily and in many cases allow people to sell their services overseas without new qualifications.

She then demanded that her well-heeled business audience show more social commitment and care for their communities. "We must heed the underlying feeling that there are some companies, particularly those with a global reach, who are playing by a different set of rules to ordinary, working people," she said. You'd never have known that this was the same prime minister who just two days earlier had been threatening to turn Britain into a tax haven if Europe didn't give her the deal she wanted. Now that might mostly involve lowering corporate taxes - itself rather against her line of argument - but it would also involve hammering down environmental, social and labour regulations. If she follows up on her plan for a trade deal with Donald Trump, it'll very likely involve a secretive investor dispute court, where firms can claim taxpayer money for government policy, as was found in the US-EU trade agreement. So which is the real Theresa May? The tax haven one aiming to secure a quick and dirty deal with Trump? Or the corporate social responsibility one?

She praised the European Union and demanded that it "should succeed", while executing a policy which fundamentally weakened and destabilised it during a time of crisis. She outlined a belief in a "global Britain", while pulling the UK out of EU free trade agreements with 63 countries.

She praised Britain's racial diversity and multiculturalism, while pursuing a hard Brexit strategy designed to placate Ukip and the right-wing fringe of her own party. She said she wanted to "strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the United Kingdom", while ignoring the will of the people of Scotland and Northern Ireland and pursuing the exact type of Brexit they had specifically said was intolerable. She said "the country is coming together" while offering those who voted Remain nothing and pursuing an extreme interpretation of a marginal referendum victory.

This was all classic double-think: What she did was in direct opposition to what she said. And yet the press bought it. They were somehow able to hold two completely contradictory thoughts in their head at once and not even notice.

When she was done with that, she simply started making stuff up. "In Britain," she told Davos business leaders, "we have embarked on an ambitious programme of economic and social reform that aims to ensure that, as we build this Global Britain, we are able to take people with us."

Eh? Which ambitious programme was that? Which bill does it relate to? Which policies? There was the proposal for workers on boards, of course, although May quietly dropped that after complaints from businesses. Now there's… promises. Of something in the future. The media report May's commitment to intervening in the economy uncritically, but there is literally nothing to show for it - not one intervention, not one policy, not one piece of legislation.

It almost makes you yearn for the days of New Labour, or the Coalition, or even the pre-Brexit Tory party. They would pretend that their policies were much more daring and radical than they were. They would pledge to end poverty or inequality and then unveil a bill with some modest proposal in it. But at least there was a bill there to unveil. At least they had to good grace to pretend to be doing something. May simply talks about programmes which do not exist.

Those are your two choices with the prime minister: rhetoric which is directly opposed to policy, or rhetoric for policies which do not exist. Of the two options, the latter is preferable.

Latest Articles

 
 

Extreme Brexit: This was May's last moment of control


 

On Jan 17, 2017 02:36 pm
Theresa May is about to play chicken with the EU. It is a game she is likely to lose.
Read more... »
 

 
 

Victory for restaurant workers as Harrods backs down over service charge  


 

On Jan 20, 2017 11:27 am
The department store will no longer take a cut from the service charge
Read more... »
 


 
 

Justine Greening's 'fair funding formula' will be devastating for schools


 

On Jan 19, 2017 09:52 am
The education secretary must seriously rethink this policy
Read more... »
 

Council policy of moving homeless out of the area spreads nationwide


 

On Jan 18, 2017 04:16 pm
Places like Birmingham and Milton Keynes are also moving families out of area
Read more... »
 

The coming Tory attack on foreign aid is a trap for Labour


 

On Jan 18, 2017 09:47 am
The party's good intentions will lead it into trouble
Read more... »
 

EU citizens in the UK are already facing Home Office threats


 

On Jan 16, 2017 09:57 am
Couple who left East Germany for freedom in Britain 31 years ago, now face an uncertain future
Read more... »
 

Opinion Formers press releases


 
 

Fact check - do lenders really oppose longer tenancies?


In a recent House of Commons debate, it was alleged that the CML was a "stumbling block" to longer tenancies in the private rented sector
Read more... »
 

BASC hopes new funding will boost numbers of Greenland white-fronted geese


BASC hopes a Welsh government research grant will support conservation measures to increase the numbers of Greenland white-fronted geese on the Dyfi Estuary.
Read more... »
 
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Copyright © 2017 Senate Media Ltd, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at www.politics.co.uk

Our mailing address is:
Senate Media Ltd
18 Vine Hill
London, EC1R 5DZ
United Kingdom

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Friday 13 January 2017

Politics at Friday Lunch: Trump, Putin and the Brexit subplot

"If Putin likes Donald Trump, guess what, folks, that's called an asset not a liability." - Donald Trump
View this email in your browser

Brexit and Trump have always had a weird relationship. They're not the same thing, no matter how some outraged liberals think of them. There are plenty of valid reasons for wanting to leave the EU, whether you agree with them or not. There are no valid reasons for supporting the president-elect.

And yet, there is a connection. Both events were driven by the same troubling global spread of authoritarian nativism, an instinctive aversion to difference and diversity, a love of control and walls.

They have always had a more direct practical relationship too. Trump tried to stamp his brand on Brexit by flying into (Remain voting) Scotland and pretending he'd played a big role in the whole thing. He predicted his victory would be Brexit 'plus plus plus'. He invited Nigel Farage to whip up the crowds for him on the campaign trail, then had him trundle along behind some Breitbart journalists to Trump Towers after the vote, and then tried to publicly pressure the prime minister into making him US ambassador.

Liberals see Brexit and Trump as part of the same story. And so does Trump.

This week that relationship swung round again, as the Brexit subplot threatened to play a key role in the Trump drama. The US is still reeling from the release of a dossier of allegations against Trump. On the crude end were unverified allegations about what he got up to sexually. On the more serious end were claims that people in his camp were working with the Russians in a conscious effort to tilt the election in their mutual favour. If the dossier were shown to be true, it would suggest that Russia had succeeded in installing its puppet as president of the United States.

The dossier came from a former MI6 operative who conducted research on public figures for clients. It was first compiled for Republican opponents, then Democrat opponents of Trump. Russia is suggesting he remains an MI6 operative. The man has reportedly gone into hiding, in fear for his life.

When reports emerged that US senator John McCain had been handed the dossier by a former British ambassador to Moscow, it felt like the Brexit-Trump connection was coming full circle again. Sir Tim Barrow, who was recently made British ambassador to the EU after the dramatic resignation of Sir Ivan Rogers, was British ambassador to Russia between 2011 and 2015 and had previously worked with the MI6 operative. These connections look inaccurate however. In the end it seemed that Sir Andrew Wood, another former ambassador to Russia,was consulted about it by McCain at a conference in Canada shortly after Trump won.

But the real connection between Brexit and Trump, in this regard, isn't about individuals. It's a broader story about destabilisation and the strange new right-wing love for Vladimir Putin.

The news is now full of allegations about Russian meddling in western affairs. It's not a new story - the KGB would always be looking to compromise presidential candidates - but it does seem to be taking place in a far more effective manner than was previously the case. In part this is due to technological change. The fake news and trolling operations being used are only possible now. In part it is also about domestic Western politics. None of it would work were it not for the disenchantment in Britain, America and elsewhere with the political class. But it is ironic that now, as Russia's economy is falling apart, it is wielding such extraordinary influence.

Most Brexiters are not fans of Putin and nor are most Republicans. But the numbers are growing. Back in July 2014, just ten percent of Republicans held a favorable view of him. By September 2016, it had grown to 24%. Today it's 37%.

Ukip has long had similar instincts. In 2014, Farage said Putin was the world leader he most admired. Last month he praised the former KGB man as "mature". Current Ukip leader Paul Nuttall told BBC's Sunday Politics that in the Middle East the Russian leader was "generally getting it right". Diane James, who was Ukip leader for all of five minutes, used at least some of that time to confirm him as one of her political heroes, alongside Churchill and Thatcher.

France National Front leader Marine Le Pen sings from the same hymn sheet, saying Putin is "looking after the interests of his own country and defending its identity".

For some people, the links are deeper. Some suspect the Kremlin funds hard-right groups like Ukip in Europe - although there has never been any evidence of a direct link between them and the British eurosceptic party.

Perhaps the hard-right sees something they like in the optics of Putin - the constant visual expressions of strength, the strong-arm KGB political tactics used domestically and internationally, the focus on control as an irreducible political virtue. Or perhaps there is a more practical web of cooperation in which Russia and its fellow travellers on the hard right cooperate. Or maybe it is more serious than that and, as that dossier implies, the West's hard-right, which is about to take power in Washington and wields increasing influence in London, is being actively maintained by the Kremlin.

The full story is coming out. But already it's clear that Brexit and Trump share much more than just their ability to play havoc with western democratic assumptions. They are part of a phenomenon which is threatening to reshape the world.

Latest Articles

 
 

We may never find out what Corbyn's position on Brexit is


 

On Jan 10, 2017 06:30 pm
Unravelling the mystery of Labour's Schrödinger free movement policy
Read more... »
 


 
 

Jon Lansman's resignation won't be his last role of the dice at Momentum


 

On Jan 12, 2017 01:14 pm
This isn't the last we will see from Lansman
Read more... »
 

Hidden cameras, mass sackings and a climate of fear: Life as a Harrods restaurant worker


 

On Jan 12, 2017 12:24 pm
It's not just the service charge that workers are upset about
Read more... »
 

I can't reach out to Brexiters anymore - they're destroying this country


 

On Jan 12, 2017 09:14 am
I'm tired of being told I should understand Leave voters
Read more... »
 

Arlene Foster needs to take responsibility for the situation in Northern Ireland


 

On Jan 11, 2017 10:05 am
The first minister's handling of the situation has been reckless
Read more... »
 

Twitter is turning us all into identity-driven social justice warriors


 

On Jan 10, 2017 01:44 pm
Nuanced political discussion has replaced by disputes hinged on ideological positioning
Read more... »
 

Trump incoming: Britain's post-Brexit reliance on the US will put it in danger


 

On Jan 10, 2017 09:40 am
Despite our new vulnerability, Britain must not become subservient to the new president
Read more... »
 

Remember policing and crime commissioners? Years on and they're still failing


 

On Jan 09, 2017 11:04 am
Turned into handmaidens of austerity by government and forgotten by the public
Read more... »
 


 
 

Union boss arrested following Harrods tips protest  


 

On Jan 08, 2017 01:02 pm
The general secretary of the union representing Harrods workers was arrested last night
Read more... »
 

 

Opinion Formers press releases

 
 

Extra local roads funding demanded


Government must inject a further £1Bn a year into local highway maintenance or risk an ever worsening "roads crisis" throughout the country, councils warned this week.
Read more... »
 

Trams need a push, inquiry hears


Britain needs to embrace more light rail, discourage workplace parking, improve links between planning and transport and encourage vehicle sharing to tackle urban congestion
Read more... »
 
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Copyright © 2017 Senate Media Ltd, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at www.politics.co.uk

Our mailing address is:
Senate Media Ltd
18 Vine Hill
London, EC1R 5DZ
United Kingdom

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences